• Publications
  • Influence
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
Structured summary 2 Provide a structured summary including, as applicable, background, objectives, data sources, study eligibility criteria, participants, interventions, study appraisal andExpand
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
TLDR
David Moher and colleagues introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and describe the challenges and opportunities in this rapidly changing environment. Expand
The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
TLDR
The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias aims to make the process clearer and more accurate. Expand
The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
TLDR
An Explanation and Elaboration of the PRISMA Statement is presented and updated guidelines for the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses are presented. Expand
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement
TLDR
A reporting guideline is described, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015), which consists of a 17-item checklist intended to facilitate the preparation and reporting of a robust protocol for the systematic review. Expand
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
Provide a structured summary including, as applicable, background, objectives, data sources, study eligibility criteria, participants, interventions, study appraisal and synthesis methods, results,Expand
Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group.
TLDR
A checklist contains specifications for reporting of meta-analyses of observational studies in epidemiology, including background, search strategy, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion should improve the usefulness ofMeta-an analyses for authors, reviewers, editors, readers, and decision makers. Expand
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration
TLDR
The meaning and rationale for each checklist item is explained, and an example of good reporting is included and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature are included. Expand
Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
TLDR
A measurement tool for the 'assessment of multiple systematic reviews' (AMSTAR) was developed that consists of 11 items and has good face and content validity for measuring the methodological quality of systematic reviews. Expand
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.
TLDR
This Explanation and Elaboration document explains the meaning and rationale for each checklist item and includes an example of good reporting and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...