Skip to search formSkip to main contentSkip to account menu
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
View on PubMed
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
TLDR
David Moher and colleagues introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and describe the challenges and opportunities in this rapidly changing environment.
View on BMJ
The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
TLDR
The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias aims to make the process clearer and more accurate.
View on Publisher
The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
TLDR
The updating of the QUOROM Statement is described, to ensure clear presentation of what was planned, done, and found in a systematic review, and the name of the reporting guidance was changed to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses).
View on PubMed
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
TLDR
David Moher and colleagues introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and describe the challenges and opportunities in this rapidly changing environment.
View on Publisher
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement
TLDR
A reporting guideline is described, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015), which consists of a 17-item checklist intended to facilitate the preparation and reporting of a robust protocol for the systematic review.
View on Springer
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
View on PubMed
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration
TLDR
The meaning and rationale for each checklist item is explained, and an example of good reporting is included and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature are included.
View on BMJ
Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group.
TLDR
A checklist contains specifications for reporting of meta-analyses of observational studies in epidemiology, including background, search strategy, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion should improve the usefulness ofMeta-an analyses for authors, reviewers, editors, readers, and decision makers.
View on PubMed
Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
TLDR
A measurement tool for the 'assessment of multiple systematic reviews' (AMSTAR) was developed that consists of 11 items and has good face and content validity for measuring the methodological quality of systematic reviews.
View on Springer
...
...
By clicking accept or continuing to use the site, you agree to the terms outlined in our Privacy Policy, Terms of Service, and Dataset License