• Publications
  • Influence
Comparison of ocular biometry and intraocular lens power using a new biometer and a standard biometer
Purpose To compare the repeatability and reproducibility of ocular biometry and intraocular lens (IOL) power obtained with a new optical biometer (AL‐Scan) and a standard optical biometer (IOLMasterExpand
  • 36
  • 7
  • PDF
Clinical comparison of a new swept‐source optical coherence tomography–based optical biometer and a time‐domain optical coherence tomography–based optical biometer
Purpose To evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of a newer swept‐source optical biometer and to compare it with a standard partial coherence interferometry (PCI) biometer. Setting SirirajExpand
  • 78
  • 6
Precision analysis of posterior corneal topography measured by Visante Omni: repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement with Orbscan II.
PURPOSE To evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of posterior corneal curvature and posterior corneal elevation best-fit sphere (BFS) obtained with the Visante Omni (Carl Zeiss Meditec) andExpand
  • 11
  • 1
  • PDF
Comparison of corneal astigmatism and axis location in cataract patients measured by total corneal power, automated keratometry, and simulated keratometry
PURPOSE: To compare the corneal astigmatism (magnitude and axis location) derived by total corneal power (TCP), automated keratometry, and simulated keratometry. SETTING: Siriraj Hospital, MahidolExpand
  • 22
  • 1
Agreement of IOL power and axial length obtained by IOLMaster 500 vs IOLMaster 500 with Sonolink connection
BackgroundThe accurrate and expedient ocular biometry is essential for modern cataract surgery. IOLMaster 500, one of the most popular partial coherence interferometry (PCI) device, has been widelyExpand
  • 2
  • 1
Comparison of refractive outcomes using conventional keratometry or total keratometry for IOL power calculation in cataract surgery
To compare the refractive outcomes following cataract surgery using conventional keratometry (K) and total keratometry (TK) for intraocular lens (IOL) calculation in the SRK/T, HofferQ, Haigis, andExpand
  • 4
  • 1
Accuracy of Holladay 2 formula using IOLMaster parameters in the absence of lens thickness value
BackgroundThe accuracy of the Holladay 2 (H2) formula is well-documented. This formula requires seven variables to estimate effective lens position (ELP) for the IOL power calculation. The lensExpand
  • 24
In Vivo Confocal Microscopy Demonstrates Increased Immune Cell Densities in Corneal Graft Rejection Correlating with Signs and Symptoms.
PURPOSE Diagnosis of graft rejection is based on patient symptoms and on clinical signs by the slit-lamp biomicroscopy. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether laser in vivo confocalExpand
  • 2
Ocular Injury due to Potassium Permanganate Granules
Purpose: We report a rare case of ocular injury due to potassium permanganate (KMnO4) granules in a child. Methods: This is a retrospective case report. Results: A 2-year-old boy was transferred toExpand
  • 3
Eyeliner Induces Tear Film Instability and Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.
PURPOSE To compare the degree of tear film instability and severity of meibomian gland dysfunction between subjects who use eyeliner and those who do not use eyeliner. METHODS This cross-sectionalExpand
  • 1