• Publications
  • Influence
Aggregating Sets of Judgments: An Impossibility Result
Suppose that the members of a certain group each hold a rational set of judgments on some interconnected questions. And imagine that the group itself now has to form a collective, rational set ofExpand
  • 575
  • 75
  • PDF
Arrow’s theorem in judgment aggregation
TLDR
In response to recent work on the aggregation of individual judgments on logically connected propositions into collective judgments, it is often asked whether judgment aggregation is a special case of preference aggregation. Expand
  • 266
  • 44
  • PDF
Judgment Aggregation By Quota Rules
The widely discussed `discursive dilemma' shows that majority voting in a group of individuals on logically connected propositions may produce irrational collective judgments. We generalize majorityExpand
  • 135
  • 32
  • PDF
STRATEGY-PROOF JUDGMENT AGGREGATION*
TLDR
We characterize all non-manipulable and all strategy-proof judgment aggregation rules and prove an impossibility theorem similar to the Gibbard--Satterthwaite theorem. Expand
  • 144
  • 31
  • PDF
Judgment aggregation: A survey
Judgment aggregation is the subject of a growing body of work in economics, political science, philosophy and related disciplines. Although the literature on judgment aggregation has been in‡uencedExpand
  • 244
  • 30
  • PDF
Group Agency - The Possibility, Design, and Status of Corporate Agents
I: THE LOGICAL POSSIBILITY OF GROUP AGENTS II: THE ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGN OF GROUP AGENTS III: THE NORMATIVE STATUS OF GROUP AGENTS
  • 434
  • 27
  • PDF
Epistemic democracy : generalizing the Condorcet jury theorem
This item was published as 'Appendix 3: An Implication of the k-option Condorcet jury mechanism for the probability of cycles' in List and Goodin (2001) http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/705/. StandardExpand
  • 412
  • 16
  • PDF
Aggregating Sets of Judgments: Two Impossibility Results Compared1
TLDR
The ``doctrinal paradox'' or ``discursive dilemma'' shows that propositionwise majority voting over the judgments held by multiple individuals on some interconnected propositions can lead to inconsistent collective judgments on these propositions. Expand
  • 191
  • 15
  • PDF
The theory of judgment aggregation: an introductory review
  • C. List
  • Computer Science
  • Synthese
  • 1 July 2012
TLDR
This paper provides an introductory review of the theory of judgment aggregation. Expand
  • 137
  • 13
  • PDF
Group Knowledge and Group Rationality: A Judgment Aggregation Perspective
  • C. List
  • Sociology
  • Episteme
  • 1 June 2005
In this paper, I introduce the emerging theory of judgment aggregation as a framework for studying institutional design in social epistemology. When a group or collective organization is given anExpand
  • 82
  • 13
  • PDF
...
1
2
3
4
5
...