Skip to search formSkip to main contentSkip to account menu
Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm.
TLDR
The best-performing measure incorporates data from the IAT's practice trials, uses a metric that is calibrated by each respondent's latency variability, and includes a latency penalty for errors, and strongly outperforms the earlier (conventional) procedure.
View on PubMed
Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.
TLDR
Across 4 studies using multiple methods, liberals consistently showed greater endorsement and use of the Harm/care and Fairness/reciprocity foundations compared to the other 3 foundations, whereas conservatives endorsed and used the 5 foundations more equally.
View on PubMed
Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience
TLDR
It is shown that the average statistical power of studies in the neurosciences is very low, and the consequences include overestimates of effect size and low reproducibility of results.
View on Nature
Mapping the moral domain.
TLDR
The Moral Foundations Questionnaire is developed on the basis of a theoretical model of 5 universally available (but variably developed) sets of moral intuitions and convergent/discriminant validity evidence suggests that moral concerns predict personality features and social group attitudes not previously considered morally relevant.
View on PubMed
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
TLDR
A large-scale assessment suggests that experimental reproducibility in psychology leaves a lot to be desired, and correlational tests suggest that replication success was better predicted by the strength of original evidence than by characteristics of the original and replication teams.
View on Publisher
A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept.
TLDR
The balanced identity design is introduced as a method to test correlational predictions of the theory and revealed that predicted consistency patterns were strongly apparent in the data for implicit (IAT) measures but not in those for parallel explicit (self-report) measures.
View on PubMed
THE GO/NO-GO ASSOCIATION TASK
Abstract Theory is constrained by the quality and versatility of measurement tools. As such, the development of techniques for measurement is critical to the successful development of theory. This…
View via Publisher
Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation.
  • Brian A. Nosek
  • Psychology
    Journal of experimental psychology. General
  • 1 November 2005
TLDR
Evidence is presented for 4 moderators of the relationship between automatic (implicit) and controlled (explicit) evaluations: self-presentation, evaluative strength, dimensionality, and distinctiveness, which moderated implicit-explicit correspondence across individuals and accounted for much of the observed variation across content domains.
View on PubMed
Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes
http://implicit.harvard.edu/ was created to provide experience with the Implicit Association Test (IAT), a procedure designed to measure social knowledge that may operate outside awareness or…
View on Taylor & Francis
The Implicit Association Test at Age 7: A Methodological and Conceptual Review
A mong earthly organisms, humans have a unique propensity to introspect or look inward into the contents of their own minds, and to share those observations with others. With the ability to…
...
...
By clicking accept or continuing to use the site, you agree to the terms outlined in our Privacy Policy, Terms of Service, and Dataset License